You know, I'm starting to doubt the value of BeautyPedia even for ingredient lists.
In the past 3 months I've emailed them 8 times correcting them on wrong information they were giving.
Today, while looking at serums I was having a look at Elizabeth Arden Ceramide Gold Ultra Restorative Capsules where Paula's review states (note the bold text):
Ceramide Gold Ultra Restorative Capsules are an interesting way to provide normal to very dry skin with a short but very effective roster of ingredients that can restore a healthy skin-barrier function, all while supplying elements that skin needs to look and feel its best. Unlike Arden’s other Ceramide capsules, this formula eliminates the silicone and squalane and gets right down to business with a ceramide-based formula. Cell-communicating ingredients follow, and Arden also included two forms of antioxidant vitamin A as well as some vitamin E. As claimed, these capsules are fragrance- and preservative-free. They are definitely a consideration for those dealing with eczema or rosacea (assuming your rosacea-prone skin is not also oily).
Then when you get down to looking at the ingredients you see:
Dimethicone, Cyclopentasiloxane, Squalene, Cyclohexasiloxane, Isostearic Acid, Ceramide 1, Ceramide 6 II, Borage Seed Oil, Linoleic Acid, Linolenic Acid, Retinyl Linoleate, Retinyl Palmitate, Tocopherol, Phytosphingosine, Oleic Acid, Hexadecanolide.
the first 4 ingredients being ones they say are not in the product.
These kind of errors then make you wonder whether it's an incorrect review or incorrect ingredient list for the product. Either way it makes me wonder whether it's worth even looking at for the ingredients, particularly given the number of mistakes I've spotted